Business Partner Disputes in Massachusetts: 27 Questions Answered
- Jeff Chang

- Jan 12
- 20 min read

Finding out your business partner may be cheating you is one of the worst feelings in business. You trusted this person. You built something together. Now you're lying awake wondering if they're stealing from you, whether you have any rights, and what you can even do about it.
If you're facing a business partner dispute in Massachusetts, this guide answers the questions we hear most often. The answers are based on Massachusetts law, but written for business owners, not lawyers.
When You Suspect Your Partner Is Taking Advantage
What can I do if my business partner is taking money from our company without my consent?
Short answer: You have legal options, and your partner is likely violating their legal duties to you.
In Massachusetts, business partners owe each other a duty to act with complete honesty and loyalty. When your partner takes money without your consent, whether through inflated salary, unauthorized "loans," or just moving cash to their personal account, they're almost certainly breaking this duty.
Here's what you can do:
Demand to see the books. You have a legal right to inspect your company's financial records. If your partner refuses, a court can force them to comply.
Send a formal letter. Put your partner on written notice that you know what's happening and that it needs to stop. This creates a record and sometimes shocks people into better behavior.
File a lawsuit. You can sue to recover the money taken, stop ongoing theft, and in some cases, get emergency orders freezing accounts or preventing your partner from moving assets.
Act quickly if money is disappearing fast. Courts can issue emergency orders within days if you can show assets are being drained.
The most important thing right now: start documenting. Save bank statements, screenshots, emails, texts. Write down what you've observed and when. This evidence matters.
I'm a 50% owner but my partner controls everything. What are my rights?
Short answer: Equal ownership means equal rights, even if your partner acts like they run the show.
Many 50/50 partnerships fall into a pattern where one partner handles the day-to-day operations and gradually starts acting like the sole owner. They control the bank account, make all the decisions, and treat you like an employee (or worse, ignore you entirely).
This is not okay, and Massachusetts law is on your side.
Your rights as a 50% owner include:
Access to information. Your partner cannot keep the finances secret from you. You're entitled to see bank statements, tax returns, contracts, and other business records.
Input on major decisions. Depending on your company's paperwork, big decisions may require both owners to agree. Even without that, your partner can't make decisions designed to hurt you or cut you out.
Fair treatment. If your partner is paying themselves a salary, taking distributions, or getting other benefits from the business, they generally can't deny you the same.
Legal recourse. If your partner refuses to treat you fairly, you can take them to court.
The hard truth about 50/50 ownership: neither of you can outvote the other. This often leads to deadlock. Many of these disputes end with one partner buying out the other, either through negotiation or after litigation creates enough pressure to force a deal.
I own less than 50%. Do I have any real power against the majority?
Short answer: Yes. Massachusetts is actually one of the better states for minority shareholders.
Many minority owners assume they have no leverage. The majority controls the votes, makes the decisions, and can do whatever they want. This is wrong.
Massachusetts law recognizes that minority shareholders in closely held businesses are vulnerable. You can't sell your shares on a stock exchange. You may depend on the business for your income. And the majority could, if unchecked, squeeze you out and take everything for themselves.
To prevent this, Massachusetts imposes strong duties on majority shareholders. They must treat you with complete honesty and fairness. They cannot use their control to freeze you out of the benefits of ownership.
What "freezing out" looks like:
Refusing to pay dividends while the majority takes big salaries
Excluding you from business decisions and information
Firing you from your job at the company
Paying the majority's relatives for do-nothing positions
Using company money for the majority's personal expenses
Draining profits through inflated rent, fees, or other payments to the majority
Pressuring you to sell your shares for less than they're worth
If any of this is happening to you, your partner is likely violating their legal duties.
What the majority cannot do:
They cannot take benefits for themselves that they deny to you. If they pay themselves, they generally need to offer you proportional compensation. If they have the company buy back their shares, they must offer you the same deal.
They cannot run the company in secrecy. You have the right to see financial records and know what's happening with your investment.
They cannot retaliate against you for asserting your rights.
Your practical leverage:
Even without majority control, you have real power:
You can demand access to books and records, and sue to enforce that right
You can bring a lawsuit for breach of fiduciary duty, which is expensive and distracting for the majority to defend
You can seek emergency court orders if assets are being drained
You can make the cost of squeezing you out higher than the cost of treating you fairly
In some situations, you may be able to block major transactions that require unanimous or supermajority approval
The majority may have more votes, but they don't have the right to cheat you. Massachusetts courts take minority shareholder claims seriously.
Can I force my business partner to buy out my shares in Massachusetts?
Short answer: Probably not through the courts, but litigation often leads to buyouts anyway.
This surprises many people, but Massachusetts courts generally cannot order your partner to purchase your ownership stake, even if your partner has clearly wronged you. The courts have said this remedy isn't available.
What courts can do:
Order your partner to pay you money damages for what they've done wrong
Order your partner to stop harmful behavior
In extreme cases, order the company dissolved and assets divided
What this means practically: most business partner disputes end in negotiated buyouts. The lawsuit itself creates leverage. Your partner may decide it's easier (and cheaper) to buy you out than to keep fighting. But you can't walk into court and get a judge to order a buyout.
Exception: If your company's paperwork (shareholder agreement, operating agreement, bylaws) includes a buyout provision, that's a contract, and courts will enforce contracts. This is one reason these agreements matter so much.
What records am I entitled to see as a minority shareholder?
Short answer: Quite a lot, and your partner can't legally keep you in the dark.
Massachusetts law gives you the right to inspect company records. You don't need a reason for the basic documents, you just need to ask properly (in writing, with a few days' notice).
Records you can get just by asking:
Company formation documents (articles, bylaws)
Minutes from shareholder meetings
Communications sent to shareholders
Names and addresses of directors and officers
The company's annual report
Records you can get if you have a good reason:
Board meeting minutes
Accounting records and financial statements
List of all shareholders
"Good reason" means something related to your ownership interest. Investigating whether your partner is cheating you definitely counts.
If your partner refuses: You can go to court and ask a judge to order them to hand over the records. If you win, the company may have to pay your attorney's fees.
My partner started a competing business using our company's customers. Is that legal?
Short answer: Almost certainly not. This is one of the clearest violations of your partner's duties.
Your partner cannot take business opportunities that belong to your company and use them for their personal benefit. When they start a competing business and divert your customers to it, they're breaching their duty of loyalty in a textbook way.
You may be able to:
Recover the profits they made from the competing business
Get a court order stopping them from continuing to solicit your customers
Sue for damages to compensate for the harm to your company
Time matters here. Every day the competing business operates, more customers may be permanently lost. If you discover this is happening, talk to a lawyer quickly about your options, including emergency relief.
We never signed a formal shareholder agreement. Do I still have rights?
Short answer: Yes. In some ways, the lack of a written agreement actually gives you more protection.
Many business partners never get around to signing formal agreements, especially when the business starts between friends or family members. You trusted each other. Why would you need a contract?
The good news: Massachusetts law protects owners of closely held businesses precisely because the law recognizes that these arrangements are built on trust. When there's no detailed written agreement, courts expect partners to treat each other with complete honesty and fairness.
Without a written agreement, you still have:
The right to honest, loyal treatment from your partner
The right to inspect company records
Voting rights based on your ownership percentage
The right to share in profits when the company distributes them
Protection against being squeezed out of the business
What you don't have without a written agreement:
A clear exit plan or formula for valuing your share
Defined procedures for resolving disputes
Specific protections you might have negotiated
The lesson: shareholder agreements are valuable and you should have one. But if you don't, you're not without rights.
How do I prove my ownership stake if our arrangement was informal?
Short answer: Through whatever evidence exists showing you were meant to be an owner.
When ownership was never put in writing, courts look at all available evidence to figure out what the parties actually intended. You don't need a stock certificate to prove you own part of a business.
Evidence that can prove ownership:
Corporate filings with the state listing you as an owner
Tax returns (personal or business) showing your ownership percentage
Bank documents with your signature authority
How profits were actually divided between you
Emails, texts, or messages referring to you as a partner or owner
How you were introduced to customers, vendors, or lenders
Your role in making major business decisions
Money you put into the business
Testimony from accountants, employees, or others who understood the arrangement
Evidence that helps less:
Your belief that you were an owner (without something to back it up)
Work you did for the business (could indicate employment, not ownership)
The more documentation you have, even informal notes or text messages, the stronger your position.
When You're the One Being Accused in a Massachusetts Business Partner Dispute
My business partner is threatening to sue me. What should I expect?
Short answer: Take it seriously, but know that most disputes settle without a trial.
A lawsuit threat is scary, but it's not the same as an actual lawsuit. Many business disputes resolve through negotiation once both sides understand the stakes.
What to do right now:
Don't delete anything. Emails, texts, financial records, everything stays. Destroying evidence after a lawsuit is threatened can result in serious penalties.
Dig out your company documents. Find your operating agreement, bylaws, shareholder agreement (if any), and any other paperwork governing your business relationship.
Talk to a lawyer. Even if you think the accusations are ridiculous, you need to understand your exposure and prepare a response.
If they actually file a lawsuit:
You'll receive formal court papers. You typically have 20 days to respond. Then begins a long process of exchanging documents, answering questions, and taking depositions (recorded interviews). This usually takes 1-2 years before reaching trial.
Most cases settle somewhere along the way. Settlement can happen at any stage.
The financial reality:
Business litigation is expensive. Even a relatively simple case can cost $50,000 to $100,000 or more in legal fees. Complex cases cost much more. Discuss the economics with your attorney early so there are no surprises.
Can I be held personally liable for decisions I made as a corporate officer?
Short answer: Usually not, unless you did something dishonest or self-serving.
The whole point of forming a corporation or LLC is to protect owners from personal liability. Courts give significant leeway to business decisions, even bad ones. Making a mistake is not the same as being liable.
When personal liability can attach:
You put your own interests ahead of the company's (self-dealing)
You took a business opportunity for yourself that should have gone to the company
You acted dishonestly or in bad faith
You personally participated in fraud or other wrongdoing
You personally guaranteed a company debt
The company was basically your personal piggy bank with no separation between business and personal finances
What protects you:
Making decisions in good faith, with reasonable information, in what you believed was the company's best interest. You don't have to be right; you just have to be honest and reasonable.
A former partner is demanding to see all our financial records. Do I have to comply?
Short answer: It depends on whether they're still an owner.
If they're still a shareholder or member:
They have legal rights to inspect company records. Refusing a legitimate request is a losing strategy. The court will order you to comply and may make you pay their attorney's fees.
But they have to follow proper procedures. They need to make the request in writing, give reasonable notice, and for some records, state a legitimate reason. You can push back on requests that are too broad, harassing, or not for a proper purpose.
If they sold their shares or are no longer an owner:
Former owners generally lose their inspection rights. However, they might still be entitled to records:
As part of a lawsuit (through discovery)
Under the terms of a buyout or separation agreement
Related to the period when they were still an owner
Don't stonewall automatically. If the request has some legal basis, refusing just makes you look like you have something to hide.
How do I protect myself when a shareholder dispute becomes contentious?
Short answer: Document everything, follow the rules, and don't make things worse.
Once you see a dispute coming, shift into protection mode:
Keep records of everything. Document business decisions, the reasons behind them, who approved them. If it wasn't written down, follow up in writing to create a record.
Follow the corporate formalities. Hold proper meetings, keep minutes, follow the procedures in your company documents. Strict compliance with the rules strengthens your position.
Don't do anything that benefits you personally without full disclosure and proper approval. No raises, no loans from the company, no deals with businesses you own, unless properly documented and approved.
Communicate in writing. When discussing disputed matters with your partner, use email. This creates a record and reduces "he said/she said" disputes.
Get professional advice. Decisions made with input from accountants and lawyers are harder to second-guess.
Don't retaliate. If your partner is making accusations, don't respond by cutting their access, changing locks, or taking other aggressive actions. Retaliation turns a defensive situation into new claims against you.
Agreements Made Across Languages and Cultures
What if our business agreements were made verbally or in Chinese?
Short answer: Verbal agreements can be enforced, and it doesn't matter what language they were made in.
Many business partnerships, especially those formed between immigrant business owners, are based on verbal agreements in the partners' native language. Maybe you discussed the partnership over dinner. Maybe you shook hands and got to work. Maybe everything was agreed in Mandarin or Cantonese with the understanding that this was how business gets done between people who trust each other.
Massachusetts law can enforce these agreements. The question isn't whether it was written down or what language was used. The question is: can you prove what was agreed?
For agreements made in Chinese:
The agreement itself is valid
Documents in Chinese can be translated and used as evidence
WeChat messages, handwritten notes, and other communications all count
Courts routinely handle cases involving non-English agreements
The challenge is proof, not validity:
Verbal agreements are harder to prove than written ones. You'll need testimony, circumstantial evidence, and whatever documentation exists (even informal messages). But "harder to prove" is different from "impossible" or "unenforceable."
An attorney who understands both the legal issues and the cultural context of how Chinese immigrant business partnerships typically form can present your situation effectively.
How do Massachusetts courts handle business disputes when key documents are in another language?
Short answer: Courts deal with this regularly. Documents get translated; interpreters help with testimony.
If your business records, partnership discussions, and agreements are in Chinese, this adds some cost and complexity but does not prevent you from pursuing your case.
How it works:
Documents in Chinese are translated into English by a certified translator
If witnesses testify in Chinese, court interpreters translate
Both sides can review translations and raise objections if they think something is wrong
What helps:
Having a lawyer who reads Chinese (or works with someone who does) makes document review more efficient and reduces the risk of missing important details in translation.
Courts are experienced with multilingual cases. You won't be penalized because your business operated in Chinese.
Formation and Investment Issues
I gave my partner money to start the business. Was that a loan or did I buy ownership?
Short answer: It depends on what you both understood at the time.
This question comes up constantly, and the answer isn't always clear. Sometimes both partners have genuinely different memories of what was agreed. Sometimes one partner is trying to rewrite history.
Signs it was probably a loan:
You discussed being paid back, with or without interest
The money was recorded as a "loan" in any paperwork
You expected repayment regardless of how the business did
You weren't involved in running the business
You never got any profit distributions
Signs it was probably an ownership investment:
You discussed being partners or co-owners
You expected to share in profits
You had input on business decisions
You were introduced to others as a partner
You received (or expected) profit distributions
If there's no clear evidence either way:
Courts look at all the circumstances: what was said, what was written (even informal notes), how the money was treated on taxes and company books, and how both parties behaved afterward.
If you're currently in this ambiguous situation, get it clarified in writing now. The longer you wait, the harder it becomes.
I worked for years helping build this business but never received shares. Do I have any claim?
Short answer: Maybe, if you were promised ownership in exchange for your work.
This situation is painfully common. You worked alongside your partner for years, often for low or no pay, believing you were building something together. Now they claim you were just an employee.
When you may have a claim:
Your partner explicitly promised you shares or ownership
You relied on that promise (turned down other opportunities, accepted lower pay)
Your work and role were consistent with being an owner, not an employee
There's evidence supporting the promise (emails, texts, witnesses)
What you'd need to prove:
That a promise was made, what the promise was, and that you relied on it. The more evidence you have, the better.
What works against you:
Accepting W-2 wages without ever raising the ownership question
Years of silence about the promised equity
No documentation whatsoever
Being excluded from owner-level decisions throughout
If you're currently in this situation (promised equity but haven't received it):
Get it in writing now. The longer you wait, the weaker your position becomes.
My name isn't on the corporate documents, but I was promised ownership. What are my options?
Short answer: You can try to prove you're an owner despite what the paperwork says, but it's an uphill battle.
When your partner files company documents listing only themselves as owner, but you had an agreement to share ownership, you're in a difficult spot. The paperwork says one thing; reality says another.
Your options:
Ask a court to fix the documents. If you can prove the paperwork doesn't reflect your actual agreement, courts can order corrections.
Claim the shares are being held in trust for you. If your partner is holding ownership that rightfully belongs to you, courts can order them to transfer it.
Sue for fraud or breach of promise. If you were cheated, you may be entitled to damages.
What you'll need:
Strong evidence that ownership was promised to you. Messages, emails, witnesses, your involvement in decisions, how you were described to others. Without some evidence beyond your own testimony, these cases are very difficult to win.
Can I recover money I invested if the business was never formally organized?
Short answer: Yes, you may be able to get your money back even if the business never got off the ground.
If you gave someone money to start a business together, and they either never started it, pocketed the money, or cut you out, you have potential claims:
If the business operated informally:
Even without formal incorporation, you may have been partners under the law. Partners have rights to an accounting and their share of partnership assets.
If the business never started:
Your claims might include breach of contract (they promised to start a business with your money), fraud (if they lied about their intentions), or unjust enrichment (they have your money and keeping it is unjust).
The practical challenge:
If there's no formal business, there may be no business assets to pursue. Your claim would be against the individual personally. Whether they have assets to pay a judgment is a separate question.
Document what you invested, when, and what it was supposed to be for. Bank records showing transfers are important evidence.
Financial Practices and Informal Arrangements
Our business has always operated with a lot of cash. How does that affect a shareholder dispute?
Short answer: It makes everything harder to prove, for both sides.
Cash businesses create major challenges in disputes because there's often no clear record of what actually happened. When revenue was never fully documented and draws were taken informally, proving who took what becomes difficult.
Problems you may face:
Incomplete records of actual revenue
No documentation of who took how much and when
Difficulty proving your partner took more than their share
Difficulty defending yourself if you're accused of taking too much
The tax problem:
If the business underreported income (which is illegal), that history complicates litigation. Neither side wants to highlight tax issues to a court. This sometimes pushes parties toward private settlement rather than public litigation.
Valuing the business:
If a buyout is being negotiated, how do you value a business whose books don't reflect reality? This often requires forensic accountants and can be contentious.
What to do:
Gather whatever documentation exists. Bank records, supplier invoices, lease payments, payroll records, anything showing money flowing in or out. Even incomplete records help establish patterns.
My partner and I both took draws from the business informally. Is that a problem now?
Short answer: It depends on whether the draws were roughly equal and mutually understood.
In many small businesses, both partners take money out without formal documentation. As long as everyone is taking similar amounts and both know what's happening, this informality is common and usually fine.
When it becomes a problem:
One partner took significantly more than the other
Draws were taken when the business couldn't afford it
The pattern wasn't disclosed on taxes properly
One partner now claims the other's draws were "unauthorized"
If you're being accused:
You'll want to show that your draws were consistent with the understood arrangement, similar to what your partner was taking, and in line with your ownership percentage.
If you're accusing your partner:
You'll need to prove what you each took and that the disparity wasn't agreed upon.
Going forward:
If you're still operating together, formalize things. Document who takes what. It protects everyone.
I loaned money to the company but never documented it. Can I still get repaid?
Short answer: You can try, but proving an undocumented loan is challenging.
If you gave money to the company expecting it back, but never got a promissory note or loan agreement, you'll need to prove the loan existed through other evidence:
Bank records showing the transfer
Emails or texts discussing the loan or repayment
Company financial records listing the debt
Tax returns reflecting the loan
Testimony from accountants or others who knew about it
Your partner acknowledging it was a loan
The risk:
Your partner might claim the money was a capital contribution (investment, not loan) or even a gift. Without documentation, it's your word against theirs.
If you're still on good terms:
Document the loan now. A written agreement signed today can memorialize an earlier oral understanding. Don't wait until there's a dispute.
Understanding the Business Partner Dispute Process
What should I do first if I think my business partner is cheating me?
Short answer: Document, preserve evidence, and consult a lawyer before taking action.
Step 1: Write down what you know.
Be specific: dates, amounts, what you saw, who said what. Don't rely on memory.
Step 2: Gather evidence you can access.
Bank statements, financial reports, emails, texts, contracts. Don't break into systems you're not authorized to use, but collect what you can legitimately access.
Step 3: Don't delete anything.
Once you suspect a dispute is coming, you have a duty to preserve evidence. Tell anyone who might routinely delete files to stop.
Step 4: Talk to a lawyer before confronting your partner.
An attorney can help you understand your options and avoid missteps that could hurt your case. What you say to your partner (and how you say it) matters.
Step 5: Think about the business.
While protecting yourself, consider the impact on the company, employees, and customers. Is there a way to address the conflict without destroying what you've built?
What does the legal process look like?
Short answer: It depends on the path you take, but understanding your options helps you make better decisions.
Not every business partner dispute in Massachusetts ends up in court. In fact, most don't. Here are the typical paths:
Negotiation: Sometimes a direct conversation, or a letter from an attorney, resolves the issue. Your partner may not realize how serious the situation has become, or may prefer to work something out rather than face a lawsuit.
Mediation: A neutral mediator helps both sides find a resolution. Mediation is private, faster than litigation, and gives you control over the outcome. Many business disputes settle this way.
Litigation: If negotiation and mediation fail, you may need to file a lawsuit. Litigation involves formal court proceedings: filing complaints, exchanging documents, taking depositions (recorded interviews), and potentially a trial. This process takes time and requires patience.
What to expect if you litigate:
The process typically unfolds in stages. After filing, both sides exchange documents and information. This "discovery" phase often reveals the full picture of what happened. Many cases settle once both sides see the evidence. If not, the case moves toward trial, where a judge decides the outcome.
Throughout this process, settlement is always possible. Cases settle at every stage, sometimes even during trial. A good attorney will keep you informed about opportunities to resolve the matter.
Should I try mediation before filing a lawsuit?
Short answer: In some cases, yes.
Mediation offers real advantages:
Privacy: Unlike court proceedings, mediation is confidential
Control: You help shape the outcome rather than leaving it to a judge
Speed: Mediation can be scheduled in weeks rather than waiting months or years for a court date
Flexibility: Mediated settlements can include creative arrangements that courts cannot order
Preserving relationships: The process is less adversarial, which matters if you'll have ongoing dealings
Mediation may not be the right first step if:
You need emergency relief to stop your partner from draining assets
Your partner is hiding information and you need court-ordered discovery to find it
Your partner has shown they won't engage in good-faith discussions
How do I find the right attorney for this?
Short answer: Look for experience with business disputes and someone who understands your situation.
Business partnership disputes require an attorney who handles commercial litigation, not someone who primarily does other types of law. The legal issues, procedures, and strategies are specific to this area.
What to look for:
Experience handling partnership and shareholder disputes
Familiarity with Massachusetts business law and courts
Willingness to explain your options clearly
Honest assessment of your case's strengths and weaknesses
Clear communication about fees and process
For disputes involving cross-cultural issues:
If your partnership involved agreements in Chinese, informal arrangements common in immigrant business communities, or cultural factors that affected how the business operated, an attorney who understands that context can present your situation more effectively.
During your first meeting:
A good attorney will listen to your situation, explain your legal options, and give you a realistic sense of what to expect. They should be direct about both the strengths and challenges of your case. Be wary of anyone who promises a specific outcome or tells you only what you want to hear.
Protecting the Business During a Partner Dispute
Can I get emergency court orders to stop my partner from draining the company?
Short answer: Yes. Courts can act quickly to freeze assets and stop harmful conduct.
If your partner is rapidly depleting company accounts, transferring assets, or taking actions that will cause immediate harm, you don't have to wait months for a lawsuit to play out. Courts can issue emergency relief within days, sometimes hours.
Types of emergency orders:
Temporary restraining order (TRO): Immediately stops specific conduct, like transferring money out of accounts, making large purchases, or taking actions outside ordinary business.
Preliminary injunction: Like a TRO but lasts longer (until the case is decided). Requires a fuller hearing.
Asset attachment: Freezes specific assets so they'll be available to satisfy a judgment.
Receiver: In extreme cases, a court can appoint a neutral third party to take control of the business or specific assets.
What you need to show:
Courts don't grant these orders lightly. You'll need evidence that harm is imminent and that you'll suffer irreparable damage without immediate action. Come prepared with documentation.
What happens to the business while we're fighting in court?
Short answer: That's one of the hardest parts. The business has to keep running while its owners are at war.
There's no good answer here. A business needs decision-making, and when the owners are in conflict, that becomes difficult or impossible.
Possible arrangements:
One partner keeps running things (with limitations ordered by the court)
Both partners continue with defined roles (uncomfortable, but sometimes necessary)
A receiver or manager is appointed (neutral party runs things during the dispute)
The business is sold and proceeds divided
The business fails (this happens when conflict consumes everything)
Protecting the business:
Even if you're furious with your partner, you both have an interest in preserving value. A destroyed business benefits no one.
Work with your attorney to establish ground rules: who can write checks and for how much, what decisions need joint approval, regular financial reporting to both sides. Structure that limits opportunities for mischief while keeping the business functioning.
Next Steps
If you've read this far, you're probably dealing with a real situation, not just idle curiosity. A business partner dispute in Massachusetts is among the most stressful experiences a business owner can face. The financial stakes are high, but so are the personal ones. These conflicts often involve people you trusted, maybe even family or close friends.
Early legal advice can make a significant difference. Understanding your rights and options before taking action helps you avoid costly mistakes and positions you for the best possible outcome, whether that's negotiation, mediation, or litigation.
Contact:
Phone: (617) 307-1238
Email: info@jchanglaw.com
WeChat: ChangLawGroupLLC
Chang Law Group LLC
One Marina Park Drive, Suite 1410
Boston, MA 02210
Disclaimer: This article provides general information about Massachusetts business law and is not legal advice. It does not create an attorney-client relationship. Business partnership disputes are complex and depend heavily on the specific facts of each situation. Do not take action based solely on this article. If you are involved in or anticipating a business dispute, consult with Chang Law Group LLC about your particular circumstances.
© 2026 Chang Law Group LLC. All rights reserved.


